S3193S
'Ironclad' Brake Third Corridor
By John
Down
Readers may recall that Charles James and I each have a
London South Western Railway (LSWR) Restaurant Composites which are making slow
progress towards restoration. Charles
and I have always harboured an ambition to have a short but nevertheless
complete LSWR train. This is not simply
a fad, but grows from the need, if we are to have gangways at all (and, on the
PBR gangways are very, very useful), to have the British Standard pattern and
not the later Pullman style used on BR Mk1 stock. So, since any such train must have a brake coach, we have, from
the very earliest days, been searching for an example of LSWR origin. We always knew that we would not get a
contemporary of the panelled 70 or 76 in brake form, but we had hoped that we
might secure an LSWR coach of the next generation – an ‘Ironclad’. S3193S was our very last chance.
S3193S was built in June 1923 at Eastleigh, just as the
Southern Railway (SR) was formed from LSWR, the London Brighton & South
Coast Railway, and the South Eastern & Chatham Railway – plus one or two
other small oddments. She was one of
the very first coaches to be built by the then new SR whose CME at the time was
Robert Maunsell. The coach however is
to a LSWR diagram, designed by their C&W Superintendent Surrey Warner. It was built to LSWR diagram 24(c) and originally
numbered 1357, though by November 1928 SR had renumbered the diagram 213. It seems that the vehicle itself was
re-numbered very soon after the grouping in 1923 as 3193 under the SR scheme. It is indeed possible that it never actually
carried its LSWR number. As built she
had British Standard gangways at each end.
Inside a side corridor served a lavatory followed by four six foot wide
side compartments and then, occupying exactly half its 57 ft length a long
luggage and guards compartment. Unlike our
earlier RCs which are carried on 9ft wheelbase outside framed double bolster
bogies, the coach is carried on a rather more conventional 9ft wheelbase inside
frame, double bolster bogie with The coach is clad in galvanized steel sheet on
a wooden bottomside and framing. The
LSWR were pioneers in this form of construction, so that, together with their
particularly ‘well-fed’ look, the coaches very quickly attracted to themselves
the soubriquet. Before we go much
further we must look at the SRs near obsession, with marshalling their
passenger vehicles into sets. An
obsession it may have been, but as a method, not only was it highly effective,
but it lasted well into BR(S) days.
The fact remains that, in LSWR terms, 3193 was part of a 5- car set
number 7(c) - (‘c’ indicated ‘corridor’) thus:
BTK 1356, TK69, FK3939, TK70, BTK1357
As noted above, by November 1928 the SR had renumbered the
set 437 and renumbered each of the vehicles:
BTK 3192, TK 725, FK
7188, TK 726, BTK 3193
On sets,
the set number is painted in large numbers on both ends of each set. By way of explanation B=brake, T=third,
F=first, K=gangwayed. ‘Ironclads’. By
an odd coincidence, set 7(C) included a vehicle numbered 70 this was a later
LSWR numbering scheme, introduced in 1912 – and not earlier LSWR scheme which
allocated 70 to my RC. Although built
as 5-sets, they were designed to normally slot in a dining car to raise the
train to a 6-set – or 6-dining type-B as they were known. At an early stage in the SRs existence it
was decreed that all gangwayed passenger vehicles would be fitted with Pullman
gangways, and with Maunsell vehicles coming on stream in large numbers, there
was a problem of marrying Pullman gangwayed stock to stock fitted with British
Standard gangways. Accordingly, by
1929, Pullman adaptors were fitted to the set’s vehicles. Although later removed when the vehicle
entered departmental service, the form of construction of the vehicle raises
few difficulties in reverting to the British Standard gangway to facilitate
coupling to either of the RCs.
For most of its early life set 437 was worked mainly on the
prestige Waterloo to Bournemouth West express dining services, with the
occasional trip to Salisbury. This was
certainly true by 1931, though by 1936 things had become a little more
interesting with additional excursion traffic to Weymouth, Portsmouth Harbour,
and, with dining car removed to revert to a 5-set on the meandering Brighton to
Cardiff route. The Ironclad’s
stranglehold on the Bournemouth route was largely removed by electrification to
Portsmouth in June 1937, and by displacement by more modern Maunsell
stock. Accordingly, in 1938, both the
TKs 725 and 726 were removed to be replaced by the 1936 built Maunsell TK
1902. This made set 437 a 4-set, and it
soon suffered the indignity of being rostered for secondary workings such as
semi-fasts from Waterloo to Basingstoke, Wareham, Bournemouth Central,
Southampton Docks, Lymington Pier, Swanage and Exmouth. It is possible that later that year that set
437 worked the Portsmouth, Salisbury and Bristol.
The outbreak of war saw promotion to 5-dining status on the
long Waterloo to Plymouth and Waterloo to Exeter services, though by the time
victory was in sight they had slumped back to 4-set status and were working the
Weymouth and West of England services out of Waterloo. The final years before nationalization saw
set 437 extended to an 8-set by the removal of TK 1902, and substitution by
five ‘loose’ TKs for ‘Special’ workings.
Grand though this sounded, it actually meant rostering onto
long-distance but slow services along the Brighton, Portsmouth, Bristol,
Cardiff axis.
Set 437 continued its
rather humdrum existence into nationalization and beyond. Most things the Southern undertook, it undertook
without fuss, and it did it very capably. Perhaps the term ‘humdrum’ is a bit
unfair, but the Ironclads were of highly durable construction, and built to
last. Certainly some of the vehicles in
the set were painted Carmine and Cream in BR(S) days, in accordance with
official edict, but they soon surreptitiously reverted to their traditional
green. Of the 154 Ironclads built
(including 40 built by the LSWR), all but two were taken into BR stock. Under BR auspices 3193 was re-numbered S3193S. The two missing vehicles were destroyed by
fire at Micheldever in August 1936 whilst working the Jersey Boat Train. Mass withdrawal of the BTKs started in
late 1957, peaking in 1959, though
one or two were kept on till 1962. Set
437 continued as an 8-set until disbanded in 1959, still working the
Bournemouth route, but relegated to Summer Saturday extras.
Disbandment and withdrawal was not
the end of the venerable but robust Ironclad S3193S. For almost a year she was on loan, to the Engineer’s Department,
Woking, and painted in red and yellow.
She was certainly spotted in the early sixties at Newhaven and at Exeter
St Davids en route to Plymouth, still ‘On loan’
In 1962 she was moved from revenue
to departmental stock (as were many of her sisters round about this time),
converted to a crane staff and tool van and renumbered DS70133. This meant removing the compartments,
fitting sliding doors to the sides, and even installing small gibbet cranes
alongside the sliding doors so that heavy items could be winched in and
out. In recognition of the fact that
she could now carry a considerable load, extra steel plating was attached to
the sides of the underframe. Conversion for departmental service saw her at Eastleigh
for underframe strengthening work, and at Lancing for bodywork modifications.
After conversion her
first branding was as ‘MP Breakdown Van, Basingstoke’. There is a suspicion that she did a brief
stint in Glasgow of all places, and Guildford is also possible.. By 1978 she was allocated to Brighton as a
Breakdown Train Unit – Staff and Tool Van.
Her last working duty it appears, on the basis of the branding remaining
on her sides was as ‘Breakdown Train Unit – Packing Van –
Wimbledon’. By January 1981 she was
effectively retired by being declared ‘Spare’ at Stewarts Lane (within sight of
Battersea Power Station). Despite being relatively recent, things get a lot
less certain than it its revenue-earning and departmental days. Final condemnation date is unknown, but she
was rescued from Marple & Gillot’s scrap merchants in South London in 1989,
by the Kent & East Sussex Railway.
In 1991 she was swapped for a Mk 1 BSK, and she was then sent to Hoo
Junction on windswept marshlands of the Medway. She arrived for secure storage at the ammunition storage depot at
Kineton in June 1999, and has remained there to this day.
She was inspected at
Kineton on 13 March, in her rather unpleasant yellow livery. To be frank, she was a bit of a
disappointment. All the roof covering
had gone leaving just the bare planking, though, despite a few planks having
lifted, were in reasonably good condition.
The inside was open from end to end and contained junk – some of which
may yet prove very useful. The decolite
floor (a sort of concrete made from cement, sawdust and iron-oxide powder) was
rotten in places. There was some slight
lean in one cantrail and some localized rusting in some of the cladding, but
the bottomside timbers were generally good (though wet) and all in all not too
bad for such a neglected lady of such advanced years. Most importantly of all,
she retained her original handbrake, and in the original position. A bid was duly made, and on 23 March we
heard that our bid was successful. She
arrived at Furnace Sidings on 4 may and was offloaded the following day.
Initial work has included immediately re-covering the roof. We have found an ideal material and have the
technique down to a fine art – this is the fourth vehicle at
Blaenavon so treated, and
we are confident in its performance.
Much of the decolite floor (a pink compound made from Portland cement,
sawdust and iron oxide powder) will need replacement., but in Douglas Fir from
the Forest of Dean. To date all of the
obviously damaged floor panels have been replaced. This included the lavatory, the vestibule outside, the first
compartment, the corridor outside, and the two adjacent corridor panels outside
the second and third compartment. Half
the guard’s compartment has also been so treated. Very soon after will be the installation of some partitions in
order to preserve the overall shape and to prevent any further movement of the
cantrails. A quick seal and paint job
is important, and she will be returning to a shade of green. Just which shade is not fixed yet – Maunsell
Olive, with lining, Bulleid Malachite or BR Stock Green are all under
consideration. Whatever shade of green
she ultimately carries, she will be numbered 3193 (with additional Ss as
appropriate). On the other hand, we might
just paint her in BTU Bright Red – just to be different! There are no plans to provide her with
passenger accommodation. The intention
is to use her initially as a workshop and secure store to aid the restoration
of LSWRs 70 and 76. When they are close
to completion, and come ‘on to the system’ she will be coupled to them to serve
as a brake vehicle. There is the
possibility of some modest development, her wide sliding doors invite
adaptation for disabled passenger and her large interior suggests any number of
roles. That however is for the long
future and belongs to another story.
|
|
A cousin BTK of 3193, BTK No 3180 during the brief
period in BR(S) ownership when she was painted carmine and cream. A cousin, rather than a sister, because
the vehicle is to diagram 135 – and is a precise mirror image of diagram
213. Note the characteristic inward
sloping side which allows a view along the vehicle from the guard’s ducket
(right at the end). This was a design
feature unique to the LSWR and its successor, the SR, apart from a few
examples built by the Lancashire and Yorkshire. High up in the shadow at the end of the vehicle can be seen the
set number 432 |
|
Still at MoD Kineton, probably February 2004 – and not looking significantly worse |
|